SN2
SHORT NOTE
5M
★ High-yield
Describe the types of witness and the recording of evidence in court.
Types of Witness
| Type | Description and rules |
|---|---|
| Common (ordinary, lay) witness | Testifies only to facts personally perceived. May not give an opinion. A neighbour may say the deceased was lying in a pool of blood, but not that the wound was caused by a knife |
| Expert witness | A person specially skilled in a science, art or trade, whose opinion is admissible under BSA 39 (formerly IEA 45). A doctor, chemical examiner, ballistics or fingerprint expert. The court may accept or reject the opinion — it is advisory, not binding |
| Hostile witness | One who, from an improper motive, does not speak the truth or resiles from a previous statement. The court may then permit the party who called them to cross-examine their own witness — ordinarily forbidden. Being declared hostile is professionally damaging and may lead to prosecution for perjury |
| Child witness | Competent if the court is satisfied the child understands the questions put and can answer rationally; the oath may be dispensed with |
| Dumb witness | May give evidence by writing or by signs made in open court, which is treated as oral evidence |
- The expert differs from the common witness in three ways — the expert may give an opinion; the expert may refer to authoritative textbooks and to their own notes; and the expert may give evidence about facts they did not personally perceive, such as an opinion on a report prepared by someone else
- The court is not bound by expert opinion, and where two experts differ the court decides. Medical opinion is advisory, and a doctor who presents it as conclusive misunderstands their role
Summons, Oath and Perjury
- A summons is a document in writing, in duplicate, issued by the court, signed by the presiding officer and bearing the seal of the court, requiring attendance at a stated place and time. It is served personally, and the duplicate is signed as acknowledgement
- A summons from a criminal court takes precedence over one from a civil court; where two criminal summonses conflict, the higher court and then the earlier-received one take precedence, and the doctor should inform the other court in writing
- Disobedience to a summons is punishable; the court may impose a fine or issue a warrant of arrest. A doctor who cannot attend must apply to be excused in advance, with reasons, and not simply fail to appear
- Conduct money — a sum tendered with the summons in a civil case to cover the witness's expenses. It may be refused as inadequate, and the witness may then decline to attend. NO conduct money is paid in a criminal case, where attendance is compulsory and expenses are reimbursed afterwards
- Oath or affirmation — administered to every witness above 12 years of age, to speak "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth"
- Perjury is wilfully giving false evidence on oath, or fabricating false evidence, punishable under BNS 227 to 229 (formerly IPC 191 to 193) with imprisonment up to 7 years and fine. The prosecution requires a complaint by the court
CLINICAL PEARL
A doctor is not punished for being wrong; they are punished for being dishonest. An opinion that later proves mistaken, honestly held and reasonably reached, is not perjury — expert opinion is expected to differ. What is punished is a statement the witness knows or believes to be false. This is exactly why the safest position in the box is the truthful one, including "I do not know", which no cross-examination can dismantle.
Recording of Evidence in Court
| Stage | Conducted by | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Examination-IN-chief | The party who called the witness — usually the prosecution, for a doctor | Leading questions are not permitted. The witness narrates their findings |
| Cross-examination | The opposing party | Leading questions are permitted, and there is NO restriction on the scope — questions may go beyond what was said in chief. Its objects are to test accuracy and veracity, to elicit favourable facts, and to shake credit |
| RE-examination | The party who called the witness | Only to clarify matters arising in cross-examination; no new matter without the court's permission |
| Questions by the court | The judge | Any question, at any stage, on any matter |
- The deposition is read over to the witness, corrected if necessary, and signed by the witness and by the presiding officer. The witness should read it rather than sign it unread, since it becomes the record of what was said
- Common tactics in cross-examination — putting a leading question inviting a yes or no where neither is accurate; quoting a textbook out of context; demanding a precise figure where only a range is possible; suggesting that a small omission in the report means the finding did not exist; flattery followed by a concession; and repeated questions on a trivial point to unsettle the witness
- The answers to all of them are the same — take time, answer only what is asked, insist on qualifying where a bare yes or no would mislead, refer to your notes, and concede what is fairly put
Applied Aspects
- Attend when summoned; failure to appear may lead to a fine or a warrant, and it damages the case and the doctor's standing more than any answer given in the box
- Take the original records, including rough notes, and ask the court's permission to refer to them; an expert is entitled to refresh memory from contemporaneous documents
- Address the judge, speak slowly, and use plain words; evidence that the court cannot record or understand has no value however accurate it is
- Say "I do not know" when you do not know; it is a complete answer, it cannot be attacked, and attempting to bluff is how doctors are declared hostile or discredited
- Never argue with counsel or with the court, and never show irritation; the object of some cross-examination is precisely to provoke it
- Do not discuss the case outside court or express opinions to the press or on social media while proceedings are pending; this can amount to contempt and will certainly be used against the witness
All questions in Introduction, Legal Procedures & the Courts
- Q1Define forensic medicine and medical jurisprudence. Describe the branches of forensic medicine, the relevant Indian statutes and the criminal courts. ★
- Q2Define inquest. Describe the types of inquest in India with their indications and procedure. ★
- Q3Describe the types of evidence and witnesses. Discuss the procedure of recording evidence in court. ★
- Q4Compare clinical and medicolegal autopsy. Describe the conduct of a medicolegal autopsy and the preservation of viscera. ★
- Q5Describe medicolegal documentation, certificates and reports. Discuss professional secrecy and privileged communication. ★
- SN1Describe the dying declaration with its recording and evidential value. ★
- SN2Describe the types of witness and the recording of evidence in court. ★
- SN3Distinguish cognizable from non-cognizable offences, and summons from warrant cases. ★
- SN4Describe the criminal courts in India with their powers of punishment. ★
- SN5Describe the constitution and functions of a medical board. ★
- SN6Define a medicolegal case. Describe the categories and the handling of a medicolegal case in casualty. ★
- SN7Describe the principles of writing a medicolegal report and the framing of opinions.