Describe the measurements of morbidity and mortality used in epidemiology.
Rates, Ratios and Proportions
Measurement is the foundation of epidemiology, and rests on distinguishing three related terms. A ratio expresses one quantity in relation to another where the numerator is not part of the denominator; a proportion is a ratio where the numerator IS part of the denominator, expressed as a percentage; and a rate is a proportion with the element of time included.
- Examples make the distinction clear — the sex ratio (males per 1000 females) is a ratio; the proportion of deaths due to cancer is a proportion; and the death rate per 1000 per year is a rate
- Every rate requires four elements — a numerator, a denominator, a specified time period, and usually a multiplier (1000, 100,000) to give a convenient whole number
- Crude rates apply to the whole population; specific rates apply to a defined subgroup (age-specific, sex-specific, cause-specific); and standardised (adjusted) rates are corrected for differences in composition, usually age
- Why standardisation matters — crude rates cannot be compared between populations of different age structure. A retirement town will have a higher crude death rate than a university town regardless of how healthy it is
- Direct standardisation applies the age-specific rates of the study populations to a standard population, giving the rates that would have occurred if both populations had the same age structure; it requires reliable age-specific rates
- Indirect standardisation applies the age-specific rates of a standard population to the study population, giving the expected number of events; the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) = (observed / expected) × 100
- An SMR of 100 means the mortality is as expected; above 100 means higher than expected. Indirect standardisation is used when age-specific rates in the study population are unreliable or the numbers small, which is common in occupational studies
Morbidity and Mortality Measures
- Incidence measures the number of new cases arising in a defined population during a specified period
- Incidence = new cases in a period / population AT risk during that period
- It measures the risk or rate of developing disease, and is therefore the measure used to study aetiology and to evaluate prevention
- Cumulative incidence (attack rate, risk) is a proportion, with the population at risk at the start as denominator; incidence density (incidence rate) uses person-time as denominator, which handles varying periods of observation
- Only those AT risk belong in the denominator — those already having the disease, or immune, or without the relevant organ, are excluded; and this is a common source of error
- Prevalence measures all cases, new and old, existing at a given time
- Point prevalence is measured at a point in time; period prevalence over an interval, and includes those who had the disease at the start plus those who developed it during the period
- Prevalence measures the burden of disease and is used for planning services and estimating workload and need
- The relationship: prevalence = incidence × duration (in a steady state)
- Its consequences must be reasoned through — prevalence rises if incidence rises, if duration lengthens (better survival without cure), or if cases immigrate; and falls with better cure, with higher case fatality, or with emigration of cases
- Therefore a falling prevalence may reflect either cure or increased deaths, and a rising prevalence may reflect successful treatment — which is why prevalence alone must never be used to judge a programme
- Prevalence is unsuitable for aetiological research, because it is influenced by survival: a study of prevalent cases over-represents those with long-lasting disease, which is survival or prevalence-incidence bias (NEYMAN bias)
- The mortality measures:
- Crude death rate = deaths in a year / mid-year population × 1000
- Specific death rates — by age, sex or cause
- Case fatality rate = deaths from a disease / total cases of that disease × 100. It measures the killing power (virulence) of the disease, and is used chiefly for acute, short-duration illness
- Proportional mortality rate = deaths from a particular cause / total deaths × 100
- The commonest error IN the subject IS TO confuse proportional mortality with cause-specific mortality — proportional mortality has total deaths as its denominator, cause-specific mortality has the population
- The consequence is that a rising proportional mortality from heart disease may mean nothing more than that fewer people are dying of infection, with no change whatever in the risk of heart disease — so proportional mortality cannot be used to compare risk between populations
- Survival rate — the proportion surviving for a specified period (commonly 5 years)
- The maternal and infant measures — infant mortality rate (deaths under 1 year per 1000 live births); neonatal (under 28 days) and post-neonatal (28 days to 1 year) rates; perinatal mortality rate (stillbirths from 28 weeks plus deaths under 7 days, per 1000 total births); stillbirth rate; under-five mortality rate; and the maternal mortality ratio (per 100,000 live births)
- Note that the perinatal rate uses total births as denominator, since stillbirths are in the numerator — a detail frequently got wrong
- The fertility measures — crude birth rate (live births per 1000 population); general fertility rate (live births per 1000 women aged 15 to 49); total fertility rate, the average number of children a woman would bear at current age-specific rates, with replacement level at about 2.1; and the net reproduction rate, which is 1.0 when a generation exactly replaces itself
- Proportional mortality is not cause-specific mortality; the denominators are total deaths and population respectively
- Rising proportional mortality may mean nothing except that fewer people are dying of something else
- Prevalence equals incidence times duration, and every consequence of that relationship should be reasoned rather than memorised
- A falling prevalence may mean cure or death, so prevalence alone can never judge a programme
- Incidence measures risk and studies aetiology, while prevalence measures burden and plans services
- Only those at risk belong in the denominator, excluding the immune and those already affected
- Person-time handles varying observation periods, which cumulative incidence cannot do
- Crude rates cannot be compared directly between populations of different age structure
- Direct standardisation needs reliable age-specific rates, and indirect is used when numbers are small
- An SMR above one hundred means worse than expected, and the measure is widely used in occupational studies
- Case fatality measures the killing power of a disease, and suits acute short illnesses rather than chronic ones
- The perinatal rate uses total births as denominator, since stillbirths appear in the numerator
- Prevalent cases over-represent long illness, which is Neyman bias and makes prevalence unsuitable for aetiology
- Replacement fertility is about two point one, and a net reproduction rate of one means a generation exactly replaces itself
- The mid-year population is the standard denominator for annual rates, approximating the average population at risk
- A rate needs numerator, denominator, time and multiplier, and omitting any of the four makes it uninterpretable
- A ratio has a numerator outside the denominator, a proportion inside it, and a rate adds time
- Total fertility rate is per woman, not per thousand, which is a common slip in written answers
- Point prevalence and period prevalence differ, the latter including those who developed disease during the interval
- Attack rate is a cumulative incidence, used in outbreaks over a short defined period
- Survival rate summarises prognosis, and is conventionally quoted at five years for malignancy
- Maternal mortality is expressed per hundred thousand, unlike infant mortality per thousand, which is easily muddled
CLINICAL PEARL
Proportional mortality is not cause-specific mortality. The first has total deaths as its denominator, the second has the population — so a rising proportional mortality from heart disease may mean only that fewer people are dying of infection, with no change in cardiac risk at all. And keep prevalence = incidence × duration in mind: a falling prevalence may mean cure, or it may mean death.
All questions in Principles of Epidemiology and Study Designs
- Q1Define epidemiology and describe its aims, uses and scope. ★
- Q2Describe the measurements of morbidity and mortality used in epidemiology. ★
- Q3Describe descriptive epidemiology and its study designs. ★
- Q4Compare and contrast case-control and cohort studies. ★
- Q5Describe experimental epidemiology and the randomised controlled trial. ★
- SN1Describe screening for disease. ★
- SN2Describe sensitivity, specificity and predictive value. ★
- SN3Describe the investigation of an epidemic. ★
- SN4Describe disease surveillance. ★
- SN5Describe the methods of sampling. ★
- SN6Describe the measures of association and risk. ★
- SN7Describe the epidemiological transition with reference to India.