Discuss digital health and telemedicine with their advantages and limitations.

Digital Health and Telemedicine

• Why this matters particularly IN INDIA — specialists are concentrated in cities and the private sector and will not be posted to remote districts in the numbers required
• Telemedicine addresses that directly by moving the opinion rather than the patient, which is cheaper for the family, faster, and possible in places where no specialist will ever live
• The types — store-and-forward (asynchronous), in which images, ECGs or reports are sent for later opinion, suited to radiology, pathology, dermatology and ophthalmology; real-time (synchronous) consultation by video or telephone; and remote monitoring of physiological parameters
• The relationships involved — doctor to patient; doctor to doctor, which includes a health worker seeking guidance; and doctor to a health worker assisting the patient
• The doctor-to-health-worker model is the most valuable in the Indian setting, since the ANM or community health officer is physically present with the patient and can examine, measure and treat under remote guidance, which overcomes the greatest limitation of telemedicine
• The INDIAN initiatives — e-sanjeevani, comprising a doctor-to-doctor service linking Health and Wellness Centres to specialists, and a direct doctor-to-patient service; the telemedicine practice guidelines, 2020; the ayushman BHARAT digital mission, with the ABHA health account, and registries of healthcare professionals and facilities; Co-win and U-win; nikshay; the HMIS and RCH portals; NCD and eHospital applications; and the National Telemedicine Network and tele-MANAS for mental health
• The telemedicine practice guidelines gave the practice a legal basis for the first time, having been issued during COVID-19 when the previous legal uncertainty had deterred practitioners
• Their key provisions — the practitioner must be registered under the relevant Act; they must exercise professional judgement on whether a teleconsultation is appropriate at all, and must advise an IN-person visit if it is not; the patient’s consent is required and is implied where the patient initiates the consultation; identity of both must be verified; records and prescriptions must be maintained as for an in-person consultation; and drugs are classified into lists with restrictions, with prohibited drugs including narcotics and specified controlled substances that may not be prescribed by teleconsultation at all
• The requirement to judge whether teleconsultation is appropriate is the most important professional safeguard, since the technology permits a consultation that clinical judgement should refuse
• The advantages — access for remote, hilly, island and tribal populations; reduced cost and time for the patient, including lost wages and transport; faster specialist opinion in emergencies such as stroke and trauma triage; continuity for chronic disease follow-up, which is largely a matter of review and adjustment; reduced infection risk, which was decisive during COVID-19; continuing education and support for isolated practitioners, which also aids retention; and second opinions
• The limitations, which should be given honestly:
• NO physical examination, which is the fundamental limitation — no palpation, percussion, auscultation or assessment of the general appearance and demeanour that experienced clinicians rely on
• Unsuitable for emergencies requiring immediate intervention and for anything requiring a procedure
• Risk of misdiagnosis and of inappropriate prescribing, particularly of antibiotics, which are easier to prescribe than to withhold at a distance
• The digital divide — requiring a device, connectivity, electricity and digital literacy, all of which are least available to the poor, the elderly, women and rural populations
• The digital divide is the most serious equity concern, since a technology intended to reduce inequality may widen it if those who most need care are least able to use it
• Within a household, a woman may not control the phone, which is a specific and frequently overlooked barrier
• Privacy, data security and confidentiality, with consultations conducted in households where privacy is impossible
• Medico-legal questions of liability and jurisdiction
• Loss of the therapeutic relationship and of non-verbal communication
• Poor interoperability between systems, so that records do not follow the patient
• The principles for appropriate use, which should conclude the answer — telemedicine should complement rather than replace in-person care; the practitioner must know when not to use it; it works best where a trained worker is present with the patient; equity must be designed in, with assisted access points rather than reliance on personal devices; data protection and consent must be genuine; and it should be used to strengthen the primary care system rather than to bypass it
• The last point matters most — a teleconsultation that connects a patient directly to a distant doctor while the local centre remains empty solves nothing and weakens what should be built

One book of nineteen in the KAVACH series · mbbsadda.in